
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Daily reminder.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Rage View Posttis but an attempt at blending in with the rest of the site, dear old friend
"Listen, Bubbs: hear that? The sounds of the whispering winds of shit."
Rest in peace, John Dunsworth (1946-2017).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oneiros View PostYou don't have to spell out numbers equal to (or greater than, at least) 10, especially in relation to age. :)
I don't have to spell out those numbers, much like you don't have to be vexatious, but we all make our choices~
"Listen, Bubbs: hear that? The sounds of the whispering winds of shit."
Rest in peace, John Dunsworth (1946-2017).
Comment
-
Originally posted by OrganizationXV View PostI thought the rule was of the inverse. Why would anyone write 1,000,000,000,000,000 when they could just say "a quadrillion"?
On the flip side, that is the difference between writing "96,582,454,327,536,278" and "ninety-six quadrillion, five hundred eighty-two trillion, four hundred fifty-four billion, three hundred twenty-seven million, five hundred thirty-six thousand, two hundred seventy-eight."
"Listen, Bubbs: hear that? The sounds of the whispering winds of shit."
Rest in peace, John Dunsworth (1946-2017).
Comment
-
Originally posted by P408370R View PostI don't have to spell out those numbers, much like you don't have to be vexatious, but we all make our choices~
Originally posted by OrganizationXV View PostWhy would anyone write 1,000,000,000,000,000Last edited by Oneiros; January 15th, 2019, 02:26 PM.
Rest in peace, John Dunsworth (1946-2017).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oneiros View Post
Technically, you do because you're neither a technical writer, nor a technician, even though your ability to "write" (so to speak) via a technological advancement in spite of your clearly unrefined technique is but a technicality, so still your paws, cur, lest you encounter some technical difficulties because someone, ah, chooses to disrupt your cellular phone with technetium, a technical felony of dastardly proportions, I daresay, and you require the aid of one of many tech experts in this technetronic society of ours.
How does one make a post with such relevancy to OP while at the same time threaten to castrate his own brother with technetium?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oneiros View PostTechnically, you do because you're neither a technical writer, nor a technician, even though your ability to "write" (so to speak) via a technological advancement in spite of your clearly unrefined technique is but a technicality, so still your paws, cur, lest you encounter some technical difficulties because someone, ah, chooses to disrupt your cellular phone with technetium, a technical felony of dastardly proportions, I daresay, and you require the aid of one of many tech experts in this technetronic society of ours.
"Listen, Bubbs: hear that? The sounds of the whispering winds of shit."
Rest in peace, John Dunsworth (1946-2017).
Comment
-
Originally posted by P408370R View PostNow you're just technicalizing. Your would-be technobabble simply serves to effectively illustrate your proclivity to act techily, which in turn arises from your technophobia. I am not ashamed to admit that that I shall fear to witness it when exacerbated by our technostructure technologizing their technos to establish a technocracy, which, like technopop, is all but inevitable.
- 1 like
Comment
Comment